RESUMO
RESUMEN La elevación de piso de seno maxilar ha sido sumamente documentada en implantología como una técnica segura y predecible en el procedimiento de ganancia vertical ósea, en el maxilar posterior atrófico. Sin embargo, conjuntamente se han reportado complicaciones en este procedimiento, las cuales podrían poner en peligro los resultados de la regeneración, y por consiguiente la colocación del implante. El propósito de esta revisión de literatura es exponer y analizar diferentes complicaciones que pueden presentarse en la elevación de piso de seno maxilar.
ABSTRACT Maxillary sinus floor elevation has been extensively documented as a safe and predictable procedure for gaining vertical bone height in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Even though, complications have been reported, which can potentially jeopardize the outcome of the regeneration and implant therapy. Therefore, the purpose of this literature review is to present, debate and analyze the different complications that can occur during a sinus floor elevation.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/efeitos adversos , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Nervo Maxilar/lesões , Mucosa Nasal/lesõesRESUMO
La cirugía de elevación de seno maxilar se considera como la técnica de aumento óseo más predecible. Sin embargo, no está exenta de complicaciones las cuales deben ser manejadas adecuadamente. Se presenta un caso clínico rehabilitado, con un seguimiento de 3 años, en el cual se realizó un manejo multidisciplinario y resolutivo de complicaciones asociadas a la técnica quirúrgica de elevación de membrana sinusal vía ventana lateral. Frente a una infección postoperatoria, como la presentada en el caso, hay que considerar iniciar un tratamiento antibiótico en el momento adecuado para impedir el agravamiento del cuadro clínico o un cambio de esquema en caso de resistencia antimicrobiana.
Maxillary sinus lift surgery is considered the most predictable bone augmentation technique. However, this procedure is not without complications, which must be handled properly. We present a rehabilitated clinical case, with a 3-year follow-up, in which a multidisciplinary and resolutive management of complications associated with the surgical technique of sinus lift procedure, using lateral window approach, was performed. In case of postoperative infection, such as the one presented in this report, it is necessary to consider starting an antibiotic treatment at the adequate moment to prevent the aggravation of the illness or change the pharmacological treatment in case of antimicrobial resistance.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Sinusite/terapia , Infecções Bacterianas/terapia , Rinite/terapia , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/reabilitação , Sinusite/etiologia , Sinusite/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Implantes Dentários , Rinite/etiologia , Rinite/microbiologia , Doença Aguda , Seguimentos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Abstract This study compared the survival rate of dental implants, amount of marginal bone loss, and rates of complications (biological and prosthetic) between short implants and long implants placed after maxillary sinus augmentation. This systematic review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number (CRD42017073929). Two reviewers searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligibility criteria included randomized controlled trials, comparisons between short implants and long implants placed after maxillary sinus augmentation in the same study, and follow-up for >6 months. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials was used to assess the quality and risk of bias of the included studies. The search identified 1366 references. After applying the inclusion criteria, 11 trials including 420 patients who received 911 dental implants were considered eligible. No significant difference was observed in the survival rate [p = 0.86; risk ratio (RR): 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-2.52] or in the amount of marginal bone loss (p = 0.08; RR: −0.05; 95%CI: −0.10 to 0.01). However, higher rates of biological complications for long implants associated with maxillary sinus augmentation were observed (p < 0.00001; RR: 0.21; 95%CI: 0.10-0.41), whereas a higher prosthetic complication rate for short implants was noted (p = 0.010; RR: 3.15; 95%CI: 1.32-7.51). Short implant placement is an effective alternative because of fewer biological complications and similar survival and marginal bone loss than long implant placement with maxillary sinus augmentation. However, the risk of mechanical complications associated with the prostheses fitted on short implants should be considered.
Assuntos
Humanos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Implantação Dentária/métodos , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/métodos , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Viés , Fatores de Risco , Perda do Osso Alveolar/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Implantação Dentária/efeitos adversos , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/efeitos adversosRESUMO
El levantamiento de piso de seno maxilar es una de las técnicas quirúrgicas más utilizadas para rehabilitar sectores posterosuperiores edéntulos, con el objetivo de ganar altura ósea para la posterior colocación de implantes y rehabilitación protética. El propósito de este trabajo fue realizar una revisión de las posibles complicaciones en el levantamiento del piso del seno maxilar y ponerlas al alcance del profesional...
Assuntos
Humanos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Fístula Bucoantral/etiologia , Prognóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais/métodos , Seio Maxilar/anatomia & histologia , Sinusite Maxilar/etiologia , CicatrizaçãoRESUMO
La elevación de piso sinusal maxilar ha sido ampliamente discutida y presenta altas tasas de éxito. El objetivo de esta investigación fue establecer la prevalencia de septum intrasinusal presente en cirugías consecutivas de elevación de piso sinusal y establecer su relación con las perforaciones de membrana sinusal. Noventa y un cirugías fueron realizadas en pacientes que presentaban indicación para instalar implantes dentales en maxila posterior; fueron incluidos aquellos pacientes que presentaron documentos clínicos íntegros (ficha clínica, radiografías, entre otros) y que no presentasen contraindicación del procedimiento; las cirugías fueron realizadas con anestesia local o general y fueron rellenados con biomateriales o hueso autógeno. El septum fue identificado mediante la imagen panorámica preoperatoria y de forma clínica intraoperatoria, mientras que cualquier complicación fue estudiada y relacionada con la presencia de septum; el estudio estadístico se realizó a través de la prueba test de Fisher siendo reconocido el valor de p<0.05. Fueron operados 72 sujetos (53 mujeres y 19 hombres) con una edad promedio de 44,5 años; en el 74,7 por ciento no se observó ningún tipo de complicación, mientras que en el 18,7 por ciento de los casos se observó perforación de la membrana sinusal. Septum sinusal fue observado en el 17,6 por ciento de los casos operados (16 senos maxilares), presentando 12 septum en posición anterior y 4 en posición posterior. La presencia de septum tuvo relación estadísticamente significativa con la laceración de membrana sinusal (p<0,05). Finalmente, podemos señalar que la presencia de septum intrasinusal se observó en 17 por ciento de los casos y se relaciona directamente con complicaciones intraoperatorias como la perforación de membrana.
Sinus lift has been widely studied and is highly successful. The aim of this research was to establish the prevalence of intrasinusal septum in consecutive surgeries for maxillary sinus floor elevation and identify the relation with sinus membrane rupture. Ninety one surgeries were realized in patients with an indication for dental implant installation in the posterior maxilla; the patient with complete clinical and medical record (card, radiography, etc.) and without contraindications for the procedure was included in the study; the surgery was realized with local or general anesthesia and the material used for inlay graft was autogenous bone or biometarials. The septum was identified by panoramic image in the preoperatory and clinically at the time of surgery; any complication was studied and related to intrasinusal septum; the statistical study was carried out with Fisher test with p value <0.05. Surgery was performed on 72 subjects (53 female and 19 male) with a mean age of 44.5 years of age; in 74.7 percent of patients no complications were observed, while 18.7 percent presented sinusal membrane rupture. The septum was observed in 18.7 percent (16 maxillary sinus), showing 12 septum in anterior position and 4 in posterior position; the presence of septum was positively related to membrane rupture (p<0.05). Finally, we can state that the intrasinusal septum was observed in 17 percent and was related to intraoperatory complications as membrane rupture.